Journal
TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 79, Issue 3, Pages 282-288Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000149506.61000.86
Keywords
transplantation; tolerance; immunoregulation; CD200
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. Both murine and human CD200 fusion proteins (CD200Fc) act as immunosuppressants after engagement of cell-bound receptors (CD200R). Anti-CD200 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) augment activity in mixed leukocyte cultures (MLCs) (increased cytotoxic T lymphocyte/cytokine production) after neutralization of endogenous CD200 activity. Previous studies documented critical regions in the N-terminal domains of both CD200 and CD200RI for ligand:receptor binding and defined a number of synthetic CD200 and CD200R peptides that antagonize that interaction. Methods. We used a panel of mAbs to mouse and human CD200Fc to compare the rank activities of antibodies for binding (flow cytometric analysis [FACS] or enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay [ELISA]) to CD200 with their abilities to augment immune reactivity in MLCs. Results. Only mAbs defining epitopes in the N-terminal domain could augment MLC reactivity (or block immunosuppression by soluble CD200Fc), whereas mAbs targeting C-domain epitopes, although reactive in ELISA or FACS (targeting cell surface CD200), were inactive in MLCs. Conclusion. In addition to defining the importance of N-terminal epitopes for CD200 function, rank comparison of mAbs for FACS staining of CD200 expressed on various cell types indicates heterogeneity in expressed CD200.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available