4.6 Article

The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages 389-398

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi054

Keywords

energy metabolism; exercise; monitoring; physiologic; motor activity; social desirability; social environment

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK52079-02, R01 DK052079-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this investigation was to examine social desirability and social approval as sources of error in three self-reported physical activity assessments using objective measures of physical activity as reference measures. In 1997, women (n = 81) living in Worcester, Massachusetts, completed doubly labeled water measurements and wore an activity monitor for 14 days. They also completed seven interviewer-administered 24-hour physical activity recalls (PARS) and two different self-administered 7-day PARS. Measures of the personality traits social desirability and social approval were regressed on 1) the difference between physical activity energy expenditure estimated from doubly labeled water and each physical activity assessment instrument and 2) the difference between monitor-derived physical activity duration and each instrument. Social desirability was associated with overreporting of activity, resulting in overestimation of physical activity energy expenditure by 0.65 kcal/kg/day on the second 7-day PAR (95% confidence interval: 0.06, 1.25) and overestimation of activity durations by 4.15-11.30 minutes/day (both 7-day PARS). Social approval was weakly associated with underestimation of physical activity on the 24-hour PAR (-0.15 kcal/kg/day, 95% confidence interval: -0.30, 0.005). Body size was not associated with reporting bias in this study. The authors conclude that social desirability and social approval may influence self-reported physical activity on some survey instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available