4.6 Review

Broad-based proteomic strategies: a practical guide to proteomics and functional screening

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 563, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.080341

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL061638, R01 HL61638, N0-HV-28180, R01 HL56370, N01HV28180, R01 HL056370] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteomics, the study of the proteome (the collection of all the proteins expressed from the genome in all isoforms, polymorphisms and post-translational modifications), is a rapidly developing field in which there are numerous new and often expensive technologies, making it imperative to use the most appropriate technology for the biological system and hypothesis being addressed. This review provides some guidelines on approaching a broad-based proteomics project, including strategies on refining hypotheses, choosing models and proteomic approaches with an emphasis on aspects of sample complexity (including abundance and protein characteristics), and separation technologies and their respective strengths and weaknesses. Finally, issues related to quantification, mass spectrometry and informatics strategies are discussed. The goal of this review is therefore twofold: the first section provides a brief outline of proteomic technologies, specifically with respect to their applications to broad-based proteomic approaches, and the second part provides more details about the application of these technologies in typical scenarios dealing with physiological and pathological processes. Proteomics at its best is the integration of carefully planned research and complementary techniques with the advantages of powerful discovery technologies that has the potential to make substantial contributions to the understanding of disease and disease processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available