4.6 Article

Granzyme B and the downstream granzymes C and/or F are important for cytotoxic lymphocyte functions

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 2124-2131

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2124

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [5T32AI07163] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK49786] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the functions of granzyme A (GzmA) and GzmB are well-defined, a number of orphan granzymes of unknown function are also expressed in cytotoxic lymphocytes. Previously, we showed that a targeted loss-of-function mutation for GzmB was associated with reduced expression of several downstream orphan granzyme genes in the lymphokine-activated killer cell compartment. To determine whether this was caused by the retained phosphoglycerate kinase I gene promoter (PGK-neo) cassette in the GzmB gene, we retargeted the GzmB gene with a LoxP-flanked PGK-neo cassette, then removed the cassette in embryonic stem cells by transiently expressing Cre recombinase. Mice homozygous for the GzmB null mutation containing the PGK-neo cassette (GzmB(-/-)/+PGK-neo) displayed reduced expression of the closely linked GzmC and F genes in their MLR-derived CTLs and lymphokine-activated killer cells; removal of the PGK-neo cassette (GzmB(-/-)/DeltaPGK-neo) restored the expression of both genes. Cytotoxic lymphocytes derived from mice with the retained PGK-neo cassette (GzmB(-/-)/+PGK-neo) had a more severe cytotoxic defect than those deficient for GzmB only (GzmB(-/-)/DeltaPGK-neo). Similarly, GzmB(-/-)/+PGK-neo mice displayed a defect in the allogeneic clearance of P815 tumor cells, whereas GzmB(-/-)/DeltaPGK-neo mice did not. These results suggest that the retained PGK-neo cassette in the GzmB gene causes a knockdown of GzmC and F expression, and also suggest that these granzymes are relevant for the function of cytotoxic lymphocytes in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available