4.3 Article

Structure conservation in cytochromes P450

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 596-609

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20354

Keywords

comparative analysis; structure super-imposition; positional conservation indices; homology modeling; drug metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent availability of crystal structures for several diverse cytochromes P450 (CYPs) offers the possibility to perform an up-to-date comparative analysis to identify the degree of structure conservation among this superfamily of enzymes specially relevant for their involvement in drug metabolism and toxicity. A set of 9 CYPs sharing between 10% and 27% sequence identity was selected, including 7 class I (CYP 101, 107, 108, 119, 121, 51, and 55) and two class II (CYP 102, and 2C5) structures. After obtaining a multiprotein structure superimposition, a structure-based sequence alignment was derived. Mapping the level of three-dimensional structural conservation onto the sequence alignment revealed that over 28% of the alignment positions have the C-alpha carbons of their residues within a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 2 Angstrom. This degree of structure conservation is found to be generally preserved, even when the structure undergoes dramatic conformational changes. Performing the analysis on 4 members of the CYP2 family (CYP 2134, 2C5, 2C8, and 2C9), the percentage of alignment positions within 2 A RMSD amounted to 73%, increasing to over 85% when only structures in a closed conformation are considered. The present findings suggest that it should be plausible to derive models of overall good quality for the major CYP2 metabolizing forms (CYP 2A6, 2C19, 2D6, and 2E1), whereas high levels of uncertainty are still likely to be expected in models for the remaining 2 major P450 metabolizing forms (CYP 1A2 and 3A4), with the corresponding implications for their potential applicability in drug design activities. (C) 2004Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available