4.6 Article

Evaluation of dendritic cells loaded with apoptotic cancer cells or expressing tumour mRNA as potential cancer vaccines against leukemia -: art. no. 20

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-20

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Leukemia is a clonal disorder characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of haematopoietic cells, and represents the most common form of cancer in children. Advances in therapy for childhood leukemia have relied increasingly on the use of high- dose chemotherapy often combined with stem- cell transplantation. Despite a high success rate and intensification of therapy, children still suffer from relapse and progressive disease resistant to further therapy. Thus, novel forms of therapy are required. Methods: This study focuses on dendritic cell ( DC) vaccination of childhood leukemia and evaluates the in vitro efficacy of different strategies for antigen loading of professional antigen-presenting cells. We have compared DCs either loaded with apoptotic leukemia cells or transfected with mRNA from the same leukemia cell line, Jurkat E6, for their capacity to induce specific CD4+ and CD8+ T- cell responses. Monocyte- derived DCs from healthy donors were loaded with tumor antigen, matured and co- cultured with autologous T cells. After one week, T-cell responses against antigen- loaded DCs were measured by enzyme- linked immunosorbent spot ( ELISPOT) assay. Results: DCs loaded with apoptotic Jurkat E6 cells or transfected with Jurkat E6- cell mRNA were both able to elicit specific T- cell responses in vitro. IFN gamma secreting T cells were observed in both the CD4+ and CD8+ subsets. Conclusion: The results indicate that loading of DCs with apoptotic leukemia cells or transfection with tumour mRNA represent promising strategies for development of cancer vaccines for treatment of childhood leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available