4.6 Article

MBNL1 is the primary determinant of focus formation and aberrant insulin receptor splicing in DM1

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 280, Issue 7, Pages 5773-5780

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M410781200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In myotonic dystrophy 1 (DMI), aggregation of the mutant DMPK RNA into RNA-protein complexes containing MENL1 and MENL2 has been linked to aberrant splicing of the insulin receptor (IR) RNA. In a parallel line of investigation, elevated levels of CUG-binding protein (CUG-BP) have been shown to result in altered IR splicing in DM1. The relative importance of MBNL1, MBNL2, and CUG-BP in DM1 pathogenesis is, however, unclear. Here we have demonstrated that either small interfering RNA-mediated down-regulation of MBNL1 and MBNL2 or the overexpression of CUG-BP in normal myoblasts results in abnormal IR splicing. Our results suggest that CUG-BP regulates the equilibrium of splice site selection by antagonizing the facilitatory activity of MBNL1 and MBNL2 on IR exon 11 splicing in a dose-dependent manner. We have shown that CUG-BP levels are elevated in DM1 cells by mechanisms that are independent of MENL1 and MBN-L2 loss. Importantly, rescue experiments in DM1 myoblasts demonstrated that loss of MBNL1 function is the key event, whereas the overexpression of CUG-BP plays a secondary role in the aberrant alternative splicing of IR RNA in DM1. Small interfering RNA-mediated down-regulation of MBNL1, MBNL2, and CUG-BP in DM1 myoblasts demonstrated that MENL1 plays a critical role in the maintenance of DM1 focus integrity. Thus, these experiments demonstrate that sequestration of MBNLI by the expanded CUG repeats is the primary determinant of both DM1 focus formation and the abnormal splicing of the IR RNA in DMI myoblasts. The data therefore support MBNL1-mediated therapy for DMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available