4.7 Article

On the importance of local sources of radiation in cosmological absorption systems

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 620, Issue 2, Pages L91-L94

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/428773

Keywords

cosmology : theory; diffuse radiation; intergalactic medium; quasars : absorption lines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An upper limit to the importance of local sources of radiation compared to the cosmic background in cosmological absorption systems is derived as a simple consequence of the conservation of surface brightness. The limit depends only on the rate of incidence of the absorbers and the mean free path of the radiation. It is found that on average, the ionizing radiation intensity from local sources in Lyman limit systems at must be less z > 2 than half of the intensity of the cosmic background. In absorbers with column densities much lower than Lyman limit systems, the local source contribution must be negligible. The limit on the ratio of local source to background intensities is then applied to the class of damped Lyalpha absorption systems with detectable excited C II lines. A cooling rate of the gas in these systems has been measured by Wolfe et al., who assumed that the balancing heating source is photoelectric heating of dust by light at similar to 1500 Angstrom. The intensity from local star formation at this wavelength in this class of damped Lyalpha systems is found to be at most similar to3 times the background intensity. If the heating source is indeed photoelectric heating of dust, the background created by sources associated with damped Lyalpha systems can then be estimated from the average cooling rates measured in the absorbers. Current results yield a background intensity higher than previous estimates based on observed galaxy and quasar luminosity functions, although with a large uncertainty. The possibility of other sources of heating, such as shock-heating in a turbulent medium, should be explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available