4.6 Article

Friedreich's ataxia, no changes in mitochondrial labile iron in human lymphoblasts and fibroblasts - A decrease in antioxidative capacity?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 280, Issue 8, Pages 6701-6708

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M408717200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is caused by low expression of frataxin, a small mitochondrial protein. Studies with both yeast and mammals have suggested that decreased frataxin levels lead to elevated intramitochondrial concentrations of labile (chelatable) iron, and consequently to oxidative mitochondrial damage. Here, we used the mitochondrion-selective fluorescent iron indicator/chelator rhodamine B-[(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-yl)aminocarbonyl]benzylester (RPA) to determine the mitochondrial chelatable iron of FRDA patient lymphoblast and fibroblast cell lines, in comparison with age- and sex-matched control cells. No alteration in the concentration of mitochondrial chelatable iron could be observed in patient cells, despite strongly decreased frataxin levels. Uptake studies with 55 Fe-transferrin and iron loading with ferric ammonium citrate revealed no significant differences in transferrin receptor density and iron responsive protein/iron regulatory element binding activity between patients and controls. However, sensitivity to H2O2 was significantly increased in patient cells, and H2O2 toxicity could be completely inhibited by the ubiquitously distributing iron chelator 2,2'-dipyridyl, but not by the mitochondrion-selective chelator RPA. Our data strongly suggest that frataxin deficiency does not affect the mitochondrial labile iron pool or other parameters of cellular iron metabolism and suggest a decreased antioxidative defense against extramitochondrial iron-derived radicals in patient cells. These results challenge current concepts favoring the use of mitochondrion-specific iron chelators and antioxidants to treat FRDA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available