4.7 Article

Antitumour activity of XR5944 in vitro and in vivo in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in colon cancer cell lines

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 722-728

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602403

Keywords

XR5944; 5-fluorouracil; irinotecan; colon cancer; xenografts; combination therapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

XR5944 (MLN944), a novel bis-phenazine, has demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity against a variety of murine and human tumour models. In the present study, the antitumour activity of XR5944 was investigated in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or irinotecan in human colon carcinoma cell lines and xenografts. In vitro cytotoxicity of the combinations following exposure to the drugs sequentially or simultaneously was evaluated by the sulphorhodamine-B assay and interactions were determined using median-effect analysis. Antagonism was observed (C1>1) following exposure of HT29 cells simultaneously to XR5944 and 5-FU or SN38 ( active metabolite of irinotecan). In contrast, sequential exposure of either combination in either order demonstrated at least an additive response (C1less than or equal to1). At least an additive response was also observed with these combinations in HCT116 cells regardless of schedule. Antitumour activity in HT29 xenografts in nude mice was enhanced by sequential administration of 5-FU ( 65 mg kg(-1)) or irinotecan (CPT-11) ( 35 mg kg(-1)) 48 h before XR5944 ( 5, 10, or 15 mg kg(-1)) compared to single agent treatment at the same or higher doses. Administration of irinotecan ( 35 mg kg(-1)) and XR5944 ( 15 mg kg(-1)) just 30 min apart yielded similar efficacy to sequential administration 48 h apart. All combinations were well tolerated. These data suggest that combinations of XR5944 with irinotecan or 5-FU are of significant interest in the treatment of colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available