4.5 Article

FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
Volume 340, Issue 3, Pages 417-428

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027

Keywords

cellulose; sodium cellulose; carbon dioxide; FTIR; hydrogen-bond intensity (HBI); crystallinity index (CI); carbonate ion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose samples treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and carbon dioxide in dimethylacetamide (DMAc) were analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. Absorbance of hydrogen-bonded OH stretching was considerably decreased by the treatment of NaOH and carbon dioxide. The relative absorbance ratio (A(4000-2995)/A(993)) represented the decrease of absorbance as a criterion of hydrogen-bond intensity (HBI). The absorbance of the band at 1430 cm(-1) due to a crystalline absorption was also decreased by NaOH treatment. The absorbance ratio of the bands at 1430 and 987-893 cm(-1) (A(1430)/A(900)), adopted as crystallinity index (CI), was closely related to the portion of cellulose I structure. With the help of FTIR equipped with an on-line evacuation apparatus, broad OH bending due to bound water could be eliminated. FTIR spectra of the carbon dioxide-treated cellulose samples at 1700-1525 cm(-1) were divided into some bands including 1663, 1635, 1616, and 1593 cm(-1). The broad OH bending due to bound water at 1641-1645 cm(-1) was resolved to two bands at 1663 and 1635 cm(-1). As a trace of DMAc, the band at 1616 cm(-1) is disappeared by washing for the cellulose treated with carbon dioxide (Cell 1-C and Cell 2/60-C). The decrease of HBI, the easy removal of DMAc, and the band at 1593 cm(-1) supported the introduction of new chemical structure in cellulose. The bands shown at 1593 and 1470 cm(-1) was assigned as hydrogen-bonded, carbonyl stretching and O-C-O stretching of the carbonate ion. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available