4.7 Article

Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 655-666

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.04.008

Keywords

energy utilization; field crop; vegetable

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research examines the energy use patterns and energy input-output analysis of some field crops (wheat, cotton, maize, sesame) and vegetables (tomato, melon, watermelon) widely grown in the Antalya region, which is one of the most important agricultural centres in Turkey. Operational inputs and energy sources for cultivating the field crops and vegetables were determined by a questionnaire applied to 102 farmers from nine villages, which were selected according to their regional properties. Basic operational parameters, such as draft force and power take off torque of agricultural implements, were measured by using a computer based data acquisition system. The highest value of the operational inputs was found to be 17,629.5 MJ ha(-1) for tomato cultivation, followed by cotton crop at 14,348.9 MJ ha(-1) and, finally, wheat crop at 3735.4 MJ ha(-1). In these operational inputs, the highest energy requirements were found for seedbed preparation and irrigation with shares of 13.7-65.1% and 26.3-40.4%, respectively. In the total energy inputs, the maximum energy requirements were determined for cultivating the tomato and cotton crops with values of 45,596.5 MJ ha(-1) and 34,891.2 MJ ha(-1), respectively. In these energy sources, fertilizer and Diesel inputs contained the highest energy with ranges of 40.1-54.1% and 17.4-43.1%, respectively. The values of specific energy and energy ratio for cultivating wheat, cotton, maize, second crop sesame, tomato, melon and watermelon crops were calculated at 5.24 MJ kg(-1) and 2.8, 11.24 MJ kg(-1) and 4.8, 3.88 MJ kg(-1) and 3.8, 16.21 MJ kg(-1) and 1.5, 1.14 MJ kg(-1) and 0.7, 0.98 MJ kg(-1) and 1.9 and 0.97 MJ kg(-1) and 2.0, respectively. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available