4.1 Article

Interleukin 1β and interleukin 6 relationship with paediatric head trauma severity and outcome

Journal

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 185-193

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-004-1032-1

Keywords

interleukin 1 beta; interleukin 6; traumatic brain injury; Glasgow Coma Scale; Glasgow Outcome Score

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Based on the known inflammatory role of interleukins (IL), we evaluated IL-1beta and IL-6 expressions and their association with the severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) and the outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score [GOS]) recorded in a paediatric population. Design: The design was a perspective observational clinical study carried out in the paediatric intensive care unit of the University Hospital. Methods: We measured the IL-1beta and IL-6 levels in 14 children with severe TBI (patients) and in 12 children with obstructive hydrocephalus (control group). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples were collected 2 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) after TBI. Interleukins were assayed using the immunoenzymatic method. Results: The IL-1beta mean level was significantly lower than the IL-6 mean level both in the CSF and plasma of TBI children. In the CSF, the IL-1beta level increased from 55.71+/-72.79 pg/ml at T1 to 106.10+/-142.12 pg/ml at T2 and the IL-6 level increased from 405.43+/-280.28 pg/ml at T1 to 631.57+/-385.35 pg/ml at T2; a similar trend was observed in plasma. We found a statistically significant correlation between the increase in CSF and plasma interleukin levels between T1 and T2 and head injury severity (GCSless than or equal to5) as well as poor outcome (GOSless than or equal to3). Conclusions: The increases in IL-1beta and IL-6 expression were correlated with head injury severity and were indicative of poor clinical outcome, reflecting an endogenous neuroinflammatory response after TBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available