4.2 Article

Neurotologic skull base surgery in pediatric patients

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 231-236

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200503000-00017

Keywords

hearing preservation; pediatric skull base surgery; vestibular schwannoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Innovations in diagnosis, surgical techniques, and perioperative care have dramatically improved outcomes in lateral skull base procedures in recent years. There is a belief, however, that children with skull base tumors have yet to benefit from these technological and procedural advances. The purpose of this study is to provide a clinical review of neurotologic skull base surgery in the pediatric population. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Private practice tertiary referral center. Patients: Eighty-nine pediatric patients undergoing 115 neurotologic procedures for lateral skull base tumors from July 1992 to September 2003. Main Outcome Measures: Initial clinical presentation, tumor type, pre- and postoperative hearing and facial nerve status, treatment course, complications, and functional outcomes. Results: The majority of tumors in this series were vestibular schwannomas, and 65 patients were diagnosed with neurofibromatosis Type 2. Surgical approaches included 70 middle fossa, 40 translabyrinthine, 2 transcochlear, 2 infratemporal fossa, and 1 retrosigmoid craniotomy. Complete tumor removal was accomplished in the majority of cases (97%), with good preservation of facial nerve function (House-Brackmann Grade I or 11) in 80% of patients. In patients undergoing middle fossa surgery for hearing preservation, measurable hearing was preserved in 61.4% of cases. The incidence of complications was low. Conclusion: With advances in diagnostic procedures and use of current neurotologic techniques, pediatric patients may undergo successful treatment of lateral skull base tumors, with good functional outcomes and minimal morbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available