4.2 Article

Control of finger force direction in the flexion-extension plane

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 161, Issue 3, Pages 307-315

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2074-z

Keywords

synergy; finger; force; error compensation; variability; human

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR048563, R01 AR048563-04, AR-048563, R01 AR048563-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG018751, AG-018751] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-35032, R01 NS035032] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have examined the interaction among individual finger forces in tasks that required the production of the total force by a subset of fingers in a particular direction in the flexion-extension plane. Nine subjects produced fingertip forces in a prescribed direction with a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) effort and held the peak force for two seconds. Six finger combinations were tested, four single-finger tasks-Index (I), Middle (M), Ring (R) and Little (L)-one two-digit task (IM), and one four-digit task (IMRL). The subjects were asked to generate the finger forces in two directions, 0degrees (perpendicular to the surface of the transducer) and 15degrees toward the palm. In all task conditions, there were two experimental sessions, with and without visual feedback on the task force vector. The main findings were: The target direction significantly affected the constant error (CE) but not the variable error (VE) while removal of the feedback resulted in an increase in VE. The direction of the forces produced by fingers that were not explicitly required to produce force (enslaved fingers) depended on the target direction. In multi-finger tasks, the individual fingers produced force in directions that could differ significantly from the target direction, while the resultant force pointed in the target direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available