4.6 Article

Nonhealing infection despite Th1 polarization produced by a strain of Leishmania major in C57BL/6 mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 5, Pages 2934-2941

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2934

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental Leishmania major infection in mice has been of immense interest because it was among the first models to demonstrate the importance of the Th1/Th2 balance to infection outcome in vivo. However, the Th2 polarization that promotes the development of nonhealing cutaneous lesions in BALB/c mice has failed to adequately explain the mechanisms underlying nonhealing forms of leishmaniasis in humans. We have studied a L. major strain from a patient with northealing lesions that also produces nonhealing lesions with ulcerations and high parasite burden in conventionally resistant C57BL/6 mice. Surprisingly, these mice develop a strong, polarized, and sustained Th1 response, as evidenced by high levels of IFN-gamma, produced by Leishmania-specific cells in the draining lymph node and in the ear lesion, and an absence of IL-4 or IL-13. The parasites fail to be effectively cleared despite high level induction of inducible NO synthase in the lesion, and despite their sensitivity to killing by IFN-gamma-activated macrophages in vitro. Infection of IL-10(-/-) mice, blockade of the IL-10R, or depletion of CD25(+) cells during the chronic phase promotes parasite killing, indicating that IL-10 and regulatory T cells play a role in rendering the Th1 responses ineffective at controlling infection in the skin. Mice with nonhealing primary lesions are nonetheless resistant to reinfection in the other ear. We suggest that nonhealing infections in animal models that are explained not by aberrant Th2 development, but by overactivation of homeostatic pathways designed to control inflammation, provide better models to understand northealing or reactivation forms of leishmaniasis in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available