4.8 Article

Circadian sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agent cyclophosphamide depends on the functional status of the CLOCK/BMAL1 transactivation complex

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409897102

Keywords

chemotherapy; circadian clock; drug response

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA102522, CA88071, R01 CA088071, CA102522] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The circadian clock controls many aspects of mammalian physiology, including responses to cancer therapy. We find that wild-type and circadian mutant mice demonstrate striking differences in their response to the anticancer drug cyclophosphamide (CY). While, the sensitivity of wild-type mice varies greatly, depending on the time of drug administration, Clock mutant and Bmal1 knockout mice are highly sensitive to treatment at all times tested. On the contrary, mice with loss-of-function mutations in Cryptochrome (Cry1(-/-)Cry2(-/-) double knockouts) were more resistant to CY compared with their wild-type littermates. Thus, both time-of-day and allelic-dependent variations in response to chemotherapy correlate with the functional status of the circadian CLOCK/BMAL1 transactivation complex. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma concentration of different CY metabolites shows that, in contrast to the traditional view, circadian variations in drug sensitivity cannot be attributed to the changes in the rates of CY metabolic activation and/or detoxification. At the same time, mice of different circadian genotypes demonstrate significant differences in B cell responses to toxic CY metabolites: B cell survival/recovery rate was directly correlated with the in vivo drug sensitivity. Based on these results, we propose that the CLOCK/BMAL1 transcriptional complex affects the lethality of chemotherapeutic agents by modulating the survival of the target cells necessary for the viability of the organism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available