4.7 Article

In vivo correction of murine hereditary tyrosinemia type I by φC31 integrase-mediated gene delivery

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 399-408

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.11.001

Keywords

nonviral somatic gene therapy; phage integrase; genetic disease

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL68112] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK048252] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phage phi C31 integrase is a site-specific recombinase that mediates efficient integration of circular extrachromosomal DNA into the host genome. Here, the integrase system was used to transfer the fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH) gene into the liver of mice affected with hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Approximately 3.6% of transfected hepatocytes experienced an integration event. The absolute frequency of integration was 1/1374. A higher proportion of integrase-transfected FAH(+) hepatocytes displayed abnormal morphology (bizarre nuclei, enlarged cells) on day 25 after gene transfer, compared to cells not receiving integrase. The increased frequency of these abnormal cells correlated with the amount of integrase plasmid administered, suggesting some form of integrase toxicity in Fah(-/-) livers. The abnormal hepatocyte appearance was transient and livers analyzed after longer selection (90 days) showed 60% repopulation with only normal healthy FAH(+) hepatocytes. A total of seven different integration sites (accounting for > 90% of integration) were identified. Serial transplantation of integrase-corrected hepatocytes to Fah(-/-) recipients was successful, suggesting long-term viability of corrected cells and persistent gene expression through many rounds of cell division. The stability of transgene expression, relatively high integration frequency, and significant site specificity that characterize the phi C31 integration system suggest that it may have utility in many gene therapy settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available