4.5 Article

IFNG polymorphisms are associated with gender differences in susceptibility to multiple sclerosis

Journal

GENES AND IMMUNITY
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 153-161

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364164

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; gender; interferon gamma (IFNG); polymorphisms; association

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-56207] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS45442] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) treatment is deleterious in multiple sclerosis ( MS). MS occurs twice as frequently in women as in men. IFNg expression varies by gender. We studied a population-based sample of US MS patients and ethnicity-matched controls and independent Northern Irish and Belgian hospital-based patients and controls for association with MS, stratified by gender, of an intron 1 microsatellite [I1(761)*CA(n)],a single nucleotide polymorphism 3' of IFNG [3'(325)* G --> A] and three flanking microsatellite markers spanning a 118 kb region around IFNG. Men carriers of the 3'(325)*A allele have increased susceptibility to MS compared to noncarriers in the USA (P = 0.044; OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 0.97-8.08) and Northern Ireland (P = 0.019; OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.10-5.13). There is a nonsignificant trend in the same direction in Belgian men (P = 0.299; OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.71-3.26). Men carriers of I1(761)*CA(13), which is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the 3'( 325)* A, have increased susceptibility (P = 0.050; OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 0.98-5.40), while men carriers of I1(761)*CA(12) have decreased susceptibility (P = 0.022; OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.90) to MS in the USA. Similar associations were reported in Sardinia between the I1(761)*CA(12) allele and reduced risk of MS in men. Flanking markers were not associated with MS susceptibility. Polymorphisms of IFNG may contribute to differences in susceptibility to MS between men and women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available