4.5 Article

Positional isomerism markedly affects the growth inhibition of colon cancer cells by nitric oxide-donating aspirin in vitro and in vivo

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.075994

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA92423, CA92423-S1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NO-donating aspirin (NO-ASA), a novel pharmacological agent currently undergoing clinical testing, consists of ASA to which a nitrate group is covalently linked via a spacer molecule. We synthesized the three positional isomers of NO-ASA with respect to the -CH2ONO2 group (ortho, meta, and para) and examined whether this isomerism affects the biological activity of NO-ASA on HT-29 human colon cancer cells. The ortho- and para-isomers showed similar IC50 values (1-5 muM) for cell growth inhibition over 72 h, whereas the IC50 of the metaisomer was 200 to 500 muM. The ortho- and para-isomers inhibited cell proliferation more potently than the meta-isomer. All three induced apoptosis but the ortho- and para-isomers also induced atypical cells (they maintain their shape but have diminished or absent nuclear material). Treatment for 3 weeks of Min (Apc(min/+)) mice, a model of intestinal cancer, with equimolar amounts of meta- and para-NO-ASA decreased the number of tumors in the small intestine by 36 and 59% (P < 0.01), respectively, compared with vehicle-treated controls, thus confirming their in vitro differences in potency. A structure-activity study of the three isomers revealed that substituting an aliphatic for the aromatic spacer or removing the -ONO2 group profoundly diminished NO-ASA's ability to inhibit cell growth, whereas removal of the acetyl group on the ASA moiety did not affect cell growth inhibition. Thus, positional isomerism is critical for the pharmacological properties of NO-ASA against colon cancer and it should be taken into consideration in rational drug design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available