4.5 Article

Compositional effects on element partitioning between Mg-silicate perovskite and silicate melts

Journal

CONTRIBUTIONS TO MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages 113-128

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-004-0641-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-pressure melting experiments were performed at similar to 26 GPa and similar to 2,200-2,400 degrees C on synthetic peridotite compositions with varying FeO and Al(2)O(3) contents and on a synthetic CI chondrite analogue composition. Peridotite liquids show a crystallisation sequence of ferropericlase (Fp) followed down temperature by Mg-silicate perovskite (MgPv) + Fp, which contrasts a sequence of MgPv followed by MgPv + Fp observed in the chondritic composition. The difference in crystallisation sequence is a consequence of the different bulk Mg/Si ratios. MgPv/melt partition coefficients for major, minor and trace elements were determined by electron microprobe and secondary ion mass spectrometry. Partition coefficients of tri- and tetravalent elements increase with increasing Al concentration in MgPv. A lattice strain model indicates that Al(3+) substitutes predominantly onto the Si-site in MgPv, whereas most elements substitute onto the Mg-site, which is consistent with a charge-compensating coupled substitution mechanism. MgPv/melt partition coefficients for Mg (D(Mg)) and Si (D(Si)) are related to the melt Mg/Si ratio such that D(Si) becomes lower than D(Mg) at low Mg/Si melt ratios. We use a crystal fractionation model, based on upper mantle refractory lithophile element ratios, to constrain the amount of MgPv and Ca-silicate perovskite (CaPv) that could have fractionated during a Hadean magma ocean event and could still be present as a chemically distinct heterogeneity in the lower mantle today. We show that a fractionated crystal pile composed of 96% MgPv and 4% CaPv could comprise up to 13 wt% of the entire mantle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available