4.5 Article

Protein-caloric food restriction affects insulin-like growth factor system in fetal Wistar rat

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 3, Pages 1364-1371

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-0665

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have previously shown that fetuses from protein-caloric undernourished pregnant rats (35% of control diet during the last week of pregnancy) at 21.5 d post coitum exhibit increased beta-cell mass. This alteration is correlated with increased insulinemia and total pancreatic insulin content, a pattern similar to that reported in infants of mild diabetic mothers. In this work, we investigated in undernourished fetuses: 1) whether availability of growth factors such as insulin, GH, and IGFs and their binding proteins (IGFBPs) could be implicated in this alteration, and 2) the beta-cell mitogenic response to IGFs in vitro. The results show that maternal undernutrition increases pancreatic IGF-I expression and islet IGF-I receptor content in undernourished fetuses, whereas hepatic IGF-I expression and serum IGF-I levels were decreased. No changes were observed in serum IGF-II, and its expression was diminished in undernourished pancreases and unchanged in the liver, compared with control fetuses. Serum levels and liver and pancreatic mRNA expression of IGFBP-1 were found to be normal in undernourished fetuses, whereas the serum concentration and abundance of IGFBP-2 mRNA in pancreas were increased. Finally, the beta-cell mitogenic response to IGFs in vitro was significantly increased in undernourished fetal islets, compared with controls. In conclusion, in undernourished fetuses the increased beta-cell mass can be related to the stimulation of replicative beta-cell response due to locally increased pancreatic IGF-I mRNA; this effect is perhaps potentiated or favored by the enhanced islet IGF-I receptor content and pancreatic IGFBP-2 gene expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available