4.7 Article

Time domain prediction approach for cross-flow VIV induced fatigue damage of steel catenary riser near touchdown point

Journal

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 166-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.09.003

Keywords

Vortex-induced vibration; SCR-soil interaction; Trench shape; Touchdown point; Soil suction; Fatigue damage

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51009089]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20100073120017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous steel catenary riser (SCR) models targeted for VIV prediction are truncated at touchdown point(TDP) where simple constrain and rotation stiffness are generally applied. In this study, a time domain approach accounting for the SCR-soil interaction is proposed to predict the cross-flow (CF) VIV induced fatigue damage of a SCR near TDP. The hydrodynamic force is simulated based on the forced vibration test data as a function of the non-dimensional amplitude and frequency, and an empirical damping model. When the non-dimensional frequency associated with the calculated frequency falls in the excitation region, the natural frequency closer to the frequency corresponding to the maximum excitation force is taken to be the dominant frequency. and applied to obtain the excitation force. The SCR-soil interaction model takes into account the trench shape, and the mobilization and release of the soil suction. Fatigue damage is linearly accumulated by using the rain-flow counting methodology. To validate the proposed models, simulation for a riser model test is carried out, and the envelopes of RMS displacement, curvature, and fatigue damage are compared. Further works focus on the sensitivity of VIV induced fatigue damage near TDP to the seabed parameters, such as mudline shear strength, shear strength gradient and soil suction, and some conclusions are obtained. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available