4.7 Article

Experimental studies on the anti-uplift behavior of the suction caissons in sand

Journal

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 37-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.08.001

Keywords

Suction caisson; Anti-uplift; Sand; Capacity; Optimum loading position; Model tests

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50909020, 51078227]
  2. Open Research Foundation of Key Laboratory of Coastal Disaster and Defense of Ministry of Education of China [51078082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of model tests was conducted in sand to explore the anti-uplift behavior of suction caissons, considering the effects of aspect ratios, load inclination angles and loading positions. This paper emphasizes on analyzing the deformation characteristic and the mechanism of the suction caissons under various loading conditions. The movement modes of the suction caisson are different when the load inclination angle increases from 0 to 90 corresponding to various mooring positions. The pull-out bearing capacity decreases with load inclination angles increasing. When the load inclination angle changes from 0 to 60, the bearing capacity reduces more significantly than that between inclination angle of 60 and 90 While the load inclination angle is relatively small, the pull-out capacity of the suction caisson decreases after reaching the peak as the loading position moves downwards. Moreover, the optimum loading position locates between 2/3 and 3/4 of the caisson length. The optimum loading position is at the bottom of the caisson when the load inclination angle exceeds 60. However, the influence of the loading position on the pull-out capacity of the caisson can be ignored while the load inclination angle equals to 90. The pull-out bearing capacity increases as the aspect ratio increases but the aspect ratio has no effect on the deformation characteristic of the suction caisson. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available