4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Repeated fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid in benign nodular thyroid disease: Critical evaluation of long-term follow-up

Journal

THYROID
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 274-278

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2005.15.274

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the most effective diagnostic means in the management of nodular thyroid disease. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the diagnostic reproducibility of FNA and the usefulness of repeated FNA in benign nodular thyroid disease. We evaluated 799 satisfactory aspirations performed in 306 patients (298 females) aged 14-84 years, followed for 2-12 years. FNAs were performed on an annual basis. Of all patients, 299 (97.71%) maintained benignity: 230 (75.16%) repeated the same cytologic pattern, and 69 (22.54%) showed diagnostic variations within benign pathologies. In 3 patients (0.98%) the diagnosis is changed to suspicious and in 4 (1.30%) to papillary carcinoma in the whole group. Of these 4 cases, in the second (0.57%) and 3 in the third repeat FNA (2.25%). In 6 cases in which increased nodular size was observed, no change to malignancy was detected, while 3 of the carcinomas found showed no changes in size. In conclusion: (1) The variation in cytologic diagnoses within benign pathologies can be attributed to the coexistence of nonuniform pathologies. Aspirations performed in different sites of the nodule would contribute to obtain a more representative specimen. (2) In the absence of suspicious clinical changes and with at least three FNAs confirming the cytologic diagnosis of benignity, the follow-up of nodules by FNA could be discontinued and (3) In our experience, the diagnostic change from benign to malignant after three repeat FNAs appears to indicate that it would be advisable to perform three procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available