4.6 Article

Differential modulation of TMJ neurons in superficial laminae of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis/upper cervical cord junction region of male and cycling female rats by morphine

Journal

PAIN
Volume 114, Issue 1-2, Pages 203-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.013

Keywords

medullary dorsal horn; opioid analgesia; sex differences; temporomandibular joint; trigeminal subnucleus caudalis; upper cervical spinal cord

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE12758] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sex differences in the cellular responses to morphine were examined in an animal model of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. TMJ-responsive neurons were recorded in the superficial laminae at the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis/upper cervical cord (Vc/C-2) junction region, the initial site of synaptic integration for TMJ afferents, in male and cycling female rats under barbiturate anesthesia. Unit activity was evoked by local injection of bradykinin into the TMJ capsule at 30 min intervals and the effects of morphine sulfate (0.03-3 mg/kg, i.v.) were assessed by a cumulative dose regimen. Morphine caused a dose-related inhibition of bradykinin-evoked unit activity in males and diestrous females in a naloxone-reversible manner, while evoked unit activity in proestrous females was not reduced. The apparent sex hormone-related aspect of morphine analgesia was selective for evoked unit activity, since the spontaneous activity of TMJ units was reduced similarly in all groups, while the convergent cutaneous receptive field area of TMJ units did not change in any group. These results were consistent with the hypothesis that sex hormone status interacts with pain control systems to modify neural activity at the level of the Vc/C-2 junction region relevant for TMD pain. (c) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available