4.7 Article

Profiling at recombinant homomeric and heteromeric rat P2X receptors identifies the suramin analogue NF449 as a highly potent P2X1 receptor antagonist

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 461-468

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.11.003

Keywords

suramin analogue; recombinant P2X receptors; Xenopus oocytes; two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology; antagonistic profile; ligand-gated ion channel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P2X receptors are cation channels gated by extracellular ATP and related nucleotides. Because of the widespread distribution of P2X receptors and the high subtype diversity, potent and selective antagonists are needed to dissect their roles in intact tissues. Based on suramin as a lead compound, several derivates have been described that block recombinant P2X receptors with orders of magnitude higher potency than suramin. Here we characterized the suramin analogue ,4',4,4'-(carbonylbis(imino-5,1,3-benzenetriylbis(carbonylimino)))tetrakis-benzene-1,3-disulfonic acid (NF449) with respect to its potency to antagonize ATP or alpha beta-pmethyleneadenosine 5'-trisphosphate-induced inward currents of homomeric rat P2X(1)-P2X(4) receptors or heteromeric P2X(1+5) and P2X(2+3) receptors, respectively. NF449 most potently blocked P2X(1) and P2X(1+5) receptors with IC50 values of 0.3 nM and 0.7 nM, respectively. Three to four orders of magnitude higher NF449 concentrations were required to block homomeric P2X(3) or heteromeric P2X(2+3) receptors (IC50 1.8 and 0.3 mu M, respectively). NF449 was least potent at homomeric P2X(2) receptors (IC50 47 mu M) and homomeric P2X(4) receptors (IC50 > 300 mu M). Altogether, these results characterize NF449 as the so far most potent and selective antagonist of receptors incorporating the P2X(1) subunit such as the P2X(1) homomer and the P2X(1+5) heteromer. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available