4.7 Article

Perinatal and reproductive factors: a report on haematological malignancies from the UKCCS

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 749-759

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.11.006

Keywords

childhood; cancer; leukaemia; lymphoma; parity; haematological; case-control; risk-factors; perinatal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study was designed to examine the potential aetiological role of a range of perinatal and reproductive factors. Our use of clinical records permitted a more exact characterisation of reproductive events than is possible in investigations that rely on self-reporting; and the increased specificity with which antecedent events were measured produced more precise risk estimates, albeit ones based on progressively smaller numbers. Information on the conduct of this component of the study and results for 1485 children with haematological malignancies and 4864 controls are presented. The 'find' rate for obstetric records was high at 86% for cases, with 81% having information on both matched controls. Associations were seen for severe hyperemesis (Odds Ratio = 3.6, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.3-10.1, for all leukaemias), polyhydramnios (OR = 4.0, 95%CI = 1.5-10.3, for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)), anaemia (haemoglobin < 10 g, OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.7-4.1, for AML), and pre-eclampsia (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.7, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Babies who developed leukaemia were heavier at birth (> 4000 g, OR = 1.2, 95%CI = 1.0-1.4), as were their older siblings (> 4000 g, OR = 1.4, 95%1.0-1.9). Mothers' whose children developed common B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) were more likely to have had a previous molar pregnancy (OR = 5.2, 95%CI = 1.9-14.7). Gender-specific analysis revealed that findings often differed markedly for boys and girls; and, in common with other reports, strong associations with Down's syndrome were seen for both ALL and AML. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available