4.8 Article

Origin of gas retention and symptoms in patients with bloating

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages 574-579

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 57064] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Patients reporting abdominal bloating exhibit impaired tolerance to intestinal gas loads. The aim of this study was to identify the gut compartment responsible for gas retention. Method : In 30 patients predominantly reporting abdominal bloating (24 with irritable bowel syndrome and 6 with functional bloating) and 22 healthy subjects, gas (nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and oxygen) was infused into the intestine for 2 hours while measuring rectal gas outflow. First, in 12 patients and 10 healthy subjects, gas transit (24 mL/min jejunal infusion labeled with 74 MBq bolus of Xe-133) was measured by scintigraphy. Second, in groups of patients and healthy subjects, the effects of gas infusion (12 mL/min) in the jejunum versus ileum, jejunum versus cecum, and jejunum versus sham infusion (n = 6 each) were compared by paired tests. Results: In patients, total gut transit of gas was delayed (50% clearance time, 33 +/- 4 min vs 23 +/- 4 min in healthy subjects; P < .05) owing to impaired small bowel transit (50% clearance time, 20 2 min vs 12 3 min in healthy subjects; P < .05), whereas colonic transit was normal (50% clearance time, 13 +/- 2 min vs 11 +/- 2 min in healthy subjects; not significant). Furthermore, jejunal gas infusion in patients was associated with gas retention (329 +/- 81 mL vs 88 +/- 79 mL in healthy subjects; P < .05), whereas direct ileal or colonic infusion was not (61 +/- 103 mL and -143 +/- 87 mL retention, respectively). Conclusions: In patients reporting bloating, the small bowel is the gut region responsible for ineffective gas propulsion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available