4.6 Article

Confirmation of errors in Hipparcos parallaxes from Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensor astrometry of the pleiades

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 1616-1624

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/427860

Keywords

astrometry; distance scale; open clusters and associations : general; stars : distances; techniques : interferometric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present absolute trigonometric parallaxes and relative proper motions for three members of the Pleiades, obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope's Fine Guidance Sensor 1r, a white-light interferometer. We estimate spectral types and luminosity classes of the stars comprising the astrometric reference frame from R approximate to 2000 spectra, VJHK photometry, and reduced proper motions. From these we derive estimates of absolute parallaxes and introduce them into our model as observations with error. We constrain the three cluster members to have a 1 sigma dispersion in distance less than 6.4 pc and find an average pi(abs) 7:43 +/- 0:17 +/- 0:20 mas, where the second error is systematic due to member placement within the cluster. This parallax corresponds to a distance of 134:6 +/- 3:1 pc or a distance modulus of m - M = 5:65 +/- 0:05 for these three Pleiades stars, presuming a central location. This result agrees with three other independent determinations of the Pleiades distance. Presuming that the cluster depth systematic error can be significantly reduced because of the random placement of these many members within the cluster, these four independent measures yield a best-estimate Pleiades distance of pi(abs) = 7:49 +/- 0:07 mas, corresponding to a distance of 133:5 +/- 1:2 pc or a distance modulus of m - M = 5:63 +/- 0:02. This resolves the dispute between the main-sequence fitting and the Hipparcos distance moduli in favor of main-sequence fitting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available