4.7 Review

Advancing metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica using the CRISPR/Cas system

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 22, Pages 9541-9548

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9366-x

Keywords

CRISPR; Cas; Metabolic engineering; Yarrowia lipolytica; Genome editing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776131, 21476111]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Teams in Universities of Jiangsu Province
  3. Priority Academic Program for the Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Bio-Manufacture [XTD1814]
  5. Aforsk Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica is widely used for the production of both bulk and fine chemicals, including organic acids, fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals, polyunsaturated fatty acids, single-cell proteins, terpenoids, and other valuable products. Consequently, it is becoming increasingly popular for metabolic engineering applications. Multiple gene manipulation tools including URA blast, Cre/LoxP, and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) have been developed for metabolic engineering in Y. lipolytica. However, the low efficiency and time-consuming procedures involved in these methods hamper further research. The emergence of the CRISPR/Cas system offers a potential solution for these problems due to its high efficiency, ease of operation, and time savings, which can significantly accelerate the genomic engineering of Y. lipolytica. In this review, we summarize the research progress on the development of CRISPR/Cas systems for Y. lipolytica, including Cas9 proteins and sgRNA expression strategies, as well as gene knock-out/knock-in and repression/activation applications. Finally, the most promising and tantalizing future prospects in this area are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available