4.6 Article

Unilateral spinal nerve ligation leads to an asymmetrical distribution of mast cells in the thalamus of female but not male mice

Journal

PAIN
Volume 114, Issue 1-2, Pages 131-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.002

Keywords

thalamus; mast cells; estrogen; allodynia; hyperalgesia; dimorphic

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39740] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mast cells are restricted to the leptomeninges and thalamus of healthy mice. These populations are increased by stress and highly sensitive to reproductive hormones. To examine the influence of nociception, a form of stress, on thalamic mast cells, we ligated the left fifth lumbar spinal nerve of male and female mice to induce hyperalgesia. Two, 7 and 14 days later, mice were killed and thalami examined histologically using toluidine blue stain. The total number of thalamic mast cells was not influenced by ligation of the spinal nerve compared to sham-operation in either female or male mice. However, in females, the percent of thalamic mast cells located on the side of the thalamus contralateral to the ligation was greater on days 2 and 7, coincident with mechanical hyperalgesia. At these times, areas in which mast cells were most dense contralateral to nerve-injury included the posterior (Po) and lateral geniculate (LG) nuclei compared to their symmetrical distribution in sham-operated mice. These data suggest that local nociceptive signals to each side of the thalamus rather than stress hormones influence the location of mast cells during the development of allodynia and hyperalgesia. In addition, both hyperalgesia and mast cell distribution induced by nerve-ligation differ in females compared to males, reflecting a novel neuroimmune response to pain within the CNS. (c) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available