4.4 Article

Structural investigation into the differential target enzyme regulation displayed by plant calmodulin isoforms

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 3101-3111

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi047770y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conserved calmodulin (CaM) isoform SCaM-1 and the divergent SCaM-4 from soybean bind to many of the same target enzymes, but differentially activate or competitively inhibit them. Class 1 target enzymes are activated by both calcium (Ca2+)-bound SCaM-1 (Ca2+-SCaM-1) and Ca2+-bound SCaM-4 (Ca2+-SCaM-4), while class 2 enzymes are activated by Ca2+-SCaM-1 but competitively inhibited by Ca2+-SCaM-4, and class 3 enzymes are activated by Ca2+-SCaM-4 but competitively inhibited by Ca2+-SCaM-1. To determine whether these differences can be attributed to unique interactions with the CaM-binding domains (CaMBD) of these enzymes, we have studied the binding of each protein to peptides derived from the CaMBD of a representative target enzyme from each of these three classes. Using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry, we demonstrate that the N- and C-domains of either Ca2+-SCaM bind to each peptide to form structurally compact complexes driven by the burial of hydrophobic surfaces. Interestingly, the interactions with the CaMBD peptides from classes I and 2 are similar for the two proteins; however, binding to the peptide from class 3 is structurally and thermodynamically distinct for Ca2+-SCaM-1 and -4. We also demonstrate that both calcium-free SCaM-1 (apo-SCaM-1) and calcium-free SCaM-4 (apo-SCaM-4) bind to the CaMBD from cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase, and that the interactions are similar to each other and to the interactions with apo-mammalian CaM. Therefore, the apo-SCaMs are also capable of binding to the same target enzymes, which could provide an additional mechanism for CaM-dependent signaling in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available