4.1 Article

Taxonomic implications of genome size for all species of the genus Gasteria Duval (Aloaceae)

Journal

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 251, Issue 2-4, Pages 217-227

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-004-0244-x

Keywords

Gasteria; taxonomy; DNA content; flow cytometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear DNA content (2C) is used as a new criterion to investigate all species of the genus Gasteria Duval including the three recently described species Gasteria polita van Jaarsv., G. pendulifolia van Jaarsv. and G. glauca van Jaarsv.. The 122 accessions investigated have the same chromosome number (2n=2x=14), with exception of three tetraploid plants found. The nuclear DNA content of the diploids, as measured by flow cytometry with Propidium Iodide, is demonstrated to range from 32.8-43.2 pg. This implies that the largest genome contains roughly 10(10) supercript stop more base pairs than the smallest. Based on DNA content the species could be divided in five groups: G. rawlinsonii Oberm. with 32.8 pg, 13 mostly inland species with 34.3-36.0 pg, five coastal species with 36.5-39.0 pg and Gasteria batesiana Rowley with 43.2 pg. The thirteen species with 34.3-36.0 pg could be divided further, in a group of eight species occupying mainly very restricted areas with 34.3-35.1 pg and a second group of five species with 35.2-36.0 pg mainly occupying large areas. These five groups did not coincide very well with the two sections and four series of Gasteria based on a cladistic analysis by van Jaarsveld et al. (1994). Based on its long leafy branches, location in the centre of Gasteria species distribution and its by far lowest DNA content, G. rawlinsonii might be the most primitive member of the genus. Nuclear DNA content as measured by flow cytometry is shown to be relevant to provide additional information on the relationships between Gasteria species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available