4.7 Article

Biosynthesis of ethylene glycol in Escherichia coli

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages 3409-3417

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4618-7

Keywords

Biosynthesis; D-Xylose; Escherichia coli; Ethylene glycol

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2012-0006693]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethylene glycol (EG) is an important platform chemical with steadily expanding global demand. Its commercial production is currently limited to fossil resources; no biosynthesis route has been delineated. Herein, a biosynthesis route for EG production from d-xylose is reported. This route consists of four steps: d-xylose -> aEuro parts per thousand d-xylonate -> aEuro parts per thousand 2-dehydro-3-deoxy-d-pentonate -> aEuro parts per thousand glycoaldehyde -> aEuro parts per thousand EG. Respective enzymes, d-xylose dehydrogenase, d-xylonate dehydratase, 2-dehydro-3-deoxy-d-pentonate aldolase, and glycoaldehyde reductase, were assembled. The route was implemented in a metabolically engineered Escherichia coli, in which the d-xylose -> aEuro parts per thousand d-xylulose reaction was prevented by disrupting the d-xylose isomerase gene. The most efficient construct produced 11.7 g L-1 of EG from 40.0 g L-1 of d-xylose. Glycolate is a carbon-competing by-product during EG production in E. coli; blockage of glycoaldehyde -> aEuro parts per thousand glycolate reaction was also performed by disrupting the gene encoding aldehyde dehydrogenase, but from this approach, EG productivity was not improved but rather led to d-xylonate accumulation. To channel more carbon flux towards EG than the glycolate pathway, further systematic metabolic engineering and fermentation optimization studies are still required to improve EG productivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available