4.7 Article

Carotenoid and lipid production by the autotrophic microalga Chlorella protothecoides under nutritional, salinity, and luminosity stress conditions

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 1383-1393

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4570-6

Keywords

Chlorella protothecoides; Microalga; Autotrophic; Carotenoids; Fatty acids; Biodiesel

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia-FCT) [PTDC/AAC-AMB/100354/2008]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/66860/2009, SFRH/BPD/42004/2007, SFRH/BD/38516/2007]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/42004/2007, SFRH/BD/38516/2007, SFRH/BD/66860/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Today microalgae represent a viable alternative source for high-value products. The specie Chlorella protothecoides (Cp), heterotrophically grown, has been widely studied and provides a high amount of lutein and fatty acids (FA) and has a good profile for biodiesel production. This work studies carotenoid and FA production by autotrophic grown Cp. Cp was grown until the medium's nitrogen was depleted, then diluted in NaCl solution, resulting in nutritional, luminosity, and salinity stresses. Different NaCl concentrations were tested (10, 20, 30 g/L) at two different dilutions. After dilution, a color shifting from green to orange-red was noticed, showing carotenoid production. The best production of both carotenoids and FA was attained with a 20 g/L NaCl solution. The total carotenoid content was 0.8 % w/w (canthaxanthin (23.3 %), echinenone (14.7 %), free astaxanthin (7.1 %), and lutein/zeaxanthin (4.1 %)). Furthermore, the total lipid content reached 43.4 % w/w, with a FA composition of C18:1 (33.64 %), C16:0 (23.30 %), C18:2 (11.53 %), and less than 12 % of C18:3, which is needed to fulfill the biodiesel quality specifications (EN 14214).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available