4.7 Article

Haptoglobin genotype- and diabetes-dependent differences in iron-mediated oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 435-441

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000156653.05853.b9

Keywords

diabetes; oxidative stress; iron; haptoglobin; hemoglobin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have recently demonstrated in multiple independent population-based longitudinal and cross sectional analyses that the haptoglobin 2-2 genotype is associated with an increased risk for diabetic cardiovascular disease. The chief function of haptoglobin (Hp) is to bind to hemoglobin and thereby prevent hemoglobin-induced oxidative tissue damage. This antioxidant function of haptoglobin is mediated in part by the ability of haptoglobin to prevent the release of iron from hemoglobin on its binding. We hypothesized that there may be diabetes- and haptoglobin genotype dependent differences in the amount of catalytically active redox active iron derived from hemoglobin. We tested this hypothesis using several complementary approaches both in vitro and in vivo. First, measuring redox active iron associated with haptoglobin-hemoglobin complexes in vitro, we demonstrate a marked increase in redox active iron associated with Hp 2-2-glycohemoglobin complexes. Second, we demonstrate increased oxidative stress in tissue culture cells exposed to haptoglobin 2-2-hemoglobin complexes as opposed to haptoglobin 1-1-hemoglobin complexes, which is inhibitable by desferrioxamine by either a chelation or reduction mechanism. Third, we demonstrate marked diabetes-dependent differences in the amount of redox active iron present in the plasma of mice genetically modified expressing the Hp 2 allele as compared with the Hp 1 allele. Taken together these data implicate redox active iron in the increased susceptibility of individuals with the Hp 2 allele to diabetic vascular disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available