4.7 Article

Activity, distribution, and abundance of methane-oxidizing bacteria in the near surface soils of onshore oil and gas fields

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 17, Pages 7909-7918

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4500-7

Keywords

Hydrocarbon microseep; Methane-oxidizing bacteria; pmoA gene; T-RFLP; Real-time PCR

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41202241, 41072099]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting [prp/OPEN-1208]
  3. SINOPEC [P11058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) have long been used as an important biological indicator for oil and gas prospecting, but the ecological characteristics of MOB in hydrocarbon microseep systems are still poorly understood. In this study, the activity, distribution, and abundance of aerobic methanotrophic communities in the surface soils underlying an oil and gas field were investigated using biogeochemical and molecular ecological techniques. Measurements of potential methane oxidation rates and pmoA gene copy numbers showed that soils inside an oil and gas field are hot spots of methane oxidation and MOB abundance. Correspondingly, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses in combination with cloning and sequencing of pmoA genes also revealed considerable differences in the methanotrophic community composition between oil and gas fields and the surrounding soils. Principal component analysis ordination furthermore indicated a coincidence between elevated CH4 oxidation activity and the methanotrophic community structure with type I methanotrophic Methylococcus and Methylobacter, in particular, as indicator species of oil and gas fields. Collectively, our results show that trace methane migrated from oil and gas reservoirs can considerably influence not only the quantity but also the structure of the methanotrophic community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available