4.6 Review

Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: Clinical experience and literature review

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages 1403-1409

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i9.1403

Keywords

Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas; Distal pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To evaluate the clinical presentations of solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPT) and examine the diagnosis, treatment, low grade malignant potential of this rare disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of seven patients with SPT managed in our hospital between July 1990 and October 2003. Six females and one male with mean age of 31 years (range 13 to 50 years) were diagnosed with SPT at our institution. RESULTS: Clinical presentation included a palpable abdominal mass in two patients and vague abdominal discomfort in another two. Two patients were asymptomatic; their tumors were found incidentally on abdominal sonographic examination for other reasons. The final patient was admitted with hemoperitoneum secondary to tumor rupture. The mean diameter of the tumors in the seven patients was 10.5 cm (range 5 to 20 cm). The lesions were located in the body and tail in five cases and in the head of the pancreas in two. Surgical procedures included distal pancreatectomy (3), distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (2), pancreaticoduodenectomy (1) and a pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure (1). There were gross adhesions or histological evidence of infiltration to the adjacent pancreas and/or splenic capsule in four cases. None of the patients received adjuvant therapy. The mean follow up was 7 years (range 0.5 to 14 years). One patient developed multiple liver metastases after 14 years of follow up. CONCLUSION: SPT is a rare tumor that behaves less aggressively than other pancreatic tumor. However, in cases with local invasion, long-term follow up is advisable. (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available