4.7 Article

Increase of lycopene production by supplementing auxiliary carbon sources in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 489-497

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3091-z

Keywords

Lycopene; Metabolically engineered Escherichia coli; Auxiliary carbon source; Fed-batch culture

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0084490]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0084490] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the fed-batch culture of glycerol using a metabolically engineered strain of Escherichia coli, supplementation with glucose as an auxiliary carbon source increased lycopene production due to a significant increase in cell mass, despite a reduction in specific lycopene content. l-Arabinose supplementation increased lycopene production due to increases in cell mass and specific lycopene content. Supplementation with both glucose and l-arabinose increased lycopene production significantly due to the synergistic effect of the two sugars. Cell growth by the consumption of carbon sources was related to endogenous metabolism in the host E. coli. Supplementation with l-arabinose stimulated only the mevalonate pathway for lycopene biosynthesis and supplementation with both glucose and l-arabinose stimulated synergistically only the mevalonate pathway. In the fed-batch culture of glycerol with 10 g l(-1) glucose and 7.5 g l(-1) l-arabinose, the cell mass, lycopene concentration, specific lycopene content, and lycopene productivity after 34 h were 42 g l(-1), 1,350 mg l(-1), 32 mg g cells(-1), and 40 mg l(-1) h(-1), respectively. These values were 3.9-, 7.1-, 1.9-, and 11.7-fold higher than those without the auxiliary carbon sources, respectively. This is the highest reported concentration and productivity of lycopene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available