4.5 Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of proton pump inhibitor therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 330, Issue 7491, Pages 568-570C

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38356.641134.8F

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To review randomised controlled trials of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor in patients with ulcer bleeding and to determine the impact on mortality, rebleeding, and surgical intervention. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Collaboration's trials register, Medline, and Embase, handsearched abstracts, and pharmaceutical companies. Review methods Included randomised controlled trials that compared proton pump inhibitor with placebo or H, receptor antagonist in endoscopically proved bleeding ulcer and reported at least one of mortality, rebleeding, or surgical intervention. Trials were graded for methodological quality. Two assessors independently reviewed each trial, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results We included 21 randomised controlled trials comprising 2915 patients. Proton pump inhibitor treatment had no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.57; number needed to treat (NNT) incalculable) but reduced rebleeding (0.46,0.33 to 0.64; NNT 12) and surgery (0.59,0.46 to 0.76; NNT 20). Results were similar when the meta-analysis was restricted to the 10 trials with the highest methodological quality: 0.96, 0.46 to 2.01, for mortality; 0.41, 0.25 to 0.68, NNT 10, for rebleeding; 0.62,0.46 to 0.83, NNT 25, for surgery. Conclusions Treatment with a proton pump inhibitor reduces the risk of rebleeding and the requirement for surgery after ulcer bleeding but has no benefit on overall mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available