4.3 Article

HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Second-Line Treatment in Children Randomized to Switch at Low Versus Higher RNA Thresholds

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000671

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) Foundation
  2. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les hepatites virales (ANRS)
  3. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG)
  4. International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT)
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UM1AI068632, UM1AI068616, UM1AI106716]
  6. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  7. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  8. 7th framework programme under the Eurocoord grant [260694]
  9. 6th framework [LSHP-CT-2006-018865]
  10. 5th framework programme [QLK2-CT-2000-00150]
  11. PENTA Foundation
  12. MRC
  13. Istituto Superiore di Sanita-Progetto Terapia Antivirale
  14. ANRS
  15. NICHD
  16. MRC [MC_UU_12023/16, MC_UU_12023/26, MC_U122886352] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12023/26, MC_UU_12023/16, MC_U122886352, MC_UU_12023/23] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The PENPACT-1 trial compared virologic thresholds to determine when to switch to second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). Using PENPACT-1 data, we aimed to describe HIV-1 drug resistance accumulation on first-line ART by virologic threshold. Methods: PENPACT-1 had a 2 x 2 factorial design, randomizing HIV-infected children to start protease inhibitor (PI) versus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART, and switch at a 1000 copies/mL versus 30,000 copies/mL threshold. Switch criteria were not achieving the threshold by week 24, confirmed rebound above the threshold thereafter, or Center for Disease Control and Prevention stage C event. Resistance tests were performed on samples >= 1000 copies/mL before switch, resuppression, and at 4-years/trial end. Results: Sixty-seven children started PI-based ART and were randomized to switch at 1000 copies/mL (PI-1000), 64 PIs and 30,000 copies/mL (PI-30,000), 67 NNRTIs and 1000 copies/mL (NNRTI-1000), and 65 NNRTI and 30,000 copies/mL (NNRTI-30,000). Ninety-four (36%) children reached the 1000 copies/mL switch criteria during 5-year follow-up. In 30,000 copies/mL threshold arms, median time from 1000 to 30,000 copies/mL switch criteria was 58 (PI) versus 80 (NNRTI) weeks (P = 0.81). In NNRTI-30,000, more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations accumulated than other groups. NNRTI mutations were selected before switching at 1000 copies/mL (23% NNRTI-1000, 27% NNRTI-30,000). Sixty-two children started abacavir + lamivudine, 166 lamivudine + zidovudine or stavudine, and 35 other NRTIs. The abacavir + lamivudine group acquired fewest NRTI mutations. Of 60 switched to second-line, 79% PI-1000, 63% PI-30,000, 64% NNRTI-1000, and 100% NNRTI-30,000 were Conclusions: Children on first-line NNRTI-based ART who were randomized to switch at a higher virologic threshold developed the most resistance, yet resuppressed on second-line. An abacavir + lamivudine NRTI combination seemed protective against development of NRTI resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available