4.7 Article

Prognostic value of pretransplantation host thymic function in HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 2608-2613

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1667

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thymic function is critical for immune reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated recipient thymic function before HSCT by quantifying T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) in pretransplantation peripheral blood lymphocytes from 102 patients who received HSCs from an HLA-identical sibling for malignant (n = 87) or nonmalignant diseases (n = 15). Median TREC value before transplantation was 257 TRECs per 150 000 CD3(+) cells (range,. 0-42 746). We assessed 1 2 TRECs per 150 000 CD3(+) cells as the most discriminating TREC value for survival in a first cohort of patients (n = 62). This cut-off was validated in a second independent prospective group of 40 patients. In the 102 patients, a TREC value greater than or equal to 172 was associated with a better survival (P < .000 01), a decreased incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; P = .017), chronic GVHD (P = .03), and bacterial (P = .003) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (P = .024). In a multivariate analysis, low pretransplantation TREC values were associated with a higher incidence of CMV infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0, P = .06) and severe bacterial infections (HR = 2.8, P = .036). Finally, high TREC values (HR = 6.6, P = .002) and ABO compatibility (HR = 2.7, P = .02) were associated with a better survival. Therefore, recipient host thymic function assessment could be helpful in predicting HSCT outcome and identifying patients who require a close immunologic monitoring. (c) 2005 by The American Society of Hematology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available