4.7 Review

Systematic review:: regression of lymphoproliferative disorders after treatment for hepatitis C infection

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 653-662

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02395.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To systematically review the experience of therapeutic studies where alpha-interferon with or without ribavirin was administered to patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, in order to evaluate whether eradication of hepatitis C virus may induce regression of lymphoproliferative disorders. Methods: We used bibliographical searches in electronic databases and in the Cochrane Library to determine our results. Results: Sixteen studies where an anti-viral regimen was administered to 65 hepatitis C virus-infected patients with lymphoproliferative disorders were identified. Complete remission of the lymphoproliferative disorder was achieved in 75% of the cases. In contrast, hepatitis C virus-negative subjects did not respond to interferon, indicating that the response in the hepatitis C virus-infected patients is not merely due to the antiproliferative effect of interferon. Remission after HCV eradication was maintained, provided that infection did not reappear. In hepatitis C virus-infected patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with corticosteroids/chemotherapy liver function tests deterioration did not occur. The addition of interferon to standard chemotherapy may decrease hepatic side-effects of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Although it is evident that larger therapeutical trials of anti-viral therapy are needed to determine the role of this strategy in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, encouraging data emerge from recent studies showing that interferon (plus ribavirin) is an attractive therapeutic option for some hepatitis C virus-related low-grade lymphomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available