4.4 Article

Botulinum neurotoxin serotype F: Identification of substrate recognition requirements and development of inhibitors with low nanomolar affinity

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 4067-4073

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0477642

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs A-G) are zinc metalloendoproteases that exhibit extraordinary specificities for proteins involved in neurotransmitter release. In view of the extreme toxicities of these molecules, their applications in human medicine, and potential for misuse, it is of considerable importance to elucidate the mechanisms underlying substrate recognition and to develop inhibitors, with the ultimate goal of obtaining anti-botulinum drugs. We synthesized peptides based on vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) to investigate the substrate requirements of BoNT F, which cleaves VAMP between residues Q58 and K59. The minimum substrate was a peptide containing VAMP residues 32-65, which includes only one of the two VAMP structural motifs thought to be required for botulinum substrate recognition. BoNT F exhibited a strict requirement for residues D57 (P-2), K59 (P-1'), and L60 (P-2'), but peptides containing substitutions for R56 (P-3) Q58 (P-1), and S61 (P-3') were cleaved. Therefore, the P2, P-1', and P-2' residues of VAMP are of paramount importance for BoNT F substrate recognition near the scissile bond. K-i values of uncleavable analogues were similar to K,,, values of the substrate, suggesting that substrate discrimination occurs at the cleavage step, not at the initial binding step. We then synthesized inhibitors of BoNT F that incorporated D-cysteine in place of glutamine 58, exhibited Ki values of 1-2 nM, and required binding groups on the N-terminal but not the C-terminal side of the zinc ligand. The latter characteristic distinguishes BoNT F from other zinc metalloendoproteases, including BoNTs A and B.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available