4.8 Article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ inhibition prevents adhesion to the extracellular matrix and induces anoikis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 2251-2259

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3037

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK02532, DK066928] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of the nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) inhibits growth and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines. To further investigate the function of PPAR gamma in HCC, PPAR gamma expression patterns in primary tumors were examined, and the responses of two HCC cell lines to PPAB gamma activation and inhibition were compared. PPAR gamma expression was increased in HCC and benign-appearing peritumoral hepatocytes compared with remote benign hepatocytes. Both compound PPAR gamma inhibitors and PPAR gamma small interfering RNAs prevented HCC cell lines from adhering to the extracellular matrix. Loss of adhesion was followed by caspase-dependent apoptosis (anoikis). PPAR gamma inhibitors had no effect on initial beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesion, or on total focal adhesion kinase levels but did reduce focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation. The PPAR gamma inhibitor T0070907 was significantly more efficient at causing cancer cell death than the activators troglitazone and rosiglitazone. T0070907 caused cell death by reducing adhesion and inducing anoikis, whereas the activators had no direct effect on adhesion and caused cell death at much higher concentrations. In conclusion, PPAR gamma overexpression is present in HCC. Inhibition of PPAR gamma function causes HCC cell death by preventing adhesion and inducing anoikis-mediated apoptosis. PPAR gamma inhibitors represent a potential novel treatment approach to HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available