4.8 Article

Biodegradability of dissolved organic from decomposing fractions of carbon leached leaf litter

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1616-1622

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es049090o

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissolved organic matter leached from decomposing organic matter is important in the leaching of nutrients from the root zone of ecosystems, eluviation of metals, and transport of hydrophobic pollutants. The objective of this study was to compare microbial mineralization rates in intact soil cores of various fractions of water-soluble dissolved organic matter. Uniformly C-14-labeled Populus fremontii leaf litter that had decomposed for 1 year was extracted in water and this extract was fractionated into phenolic, humic acid, fulvic acid, hydrophilic acid, and hydrophilic neutral fractions. Fulvic acid comprised 42.1% of C in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) extracted from the litter. These fractions were added to intact cores of soil or sand, and respired (CO2)-C-14 was collected. The percentage of labeled substrate C mineralized in soil at the end of 1 year was, in order from least to greatest, hydrophilic acid (30.5), fulvic acid (33.8), humic acid (39.0), whole, unfractionated DOC (43.5), unseparated hydrophilic acid and neutral (44.7), phenolic (63.3), glucose (66.4), and hydrophilic neutral (70.2). In acid-washed nutrient-amended sand that was inoculated with soil microbes, mineralization rates of fulvic acid and glucose were lower. The fractionation appeared to separate the DOC into components with widely different rates of mineralization. Results also supported the ideas that the dissolved humic substance and hydrophilic acid fractions are inherently difficult for microbes to mineralize, and this property can contribute to movement of refractory C in soil and into aquatic ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available