4.7 Article

Deep pacific CaCO3 compensation and glacial-interglacial atmosphericCO2

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 231, Issue 3-4, Pages 317-336

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.12.024

Keywords

carbonate compensation; carbon dioxide; benthic foraminifera; zinc; cadmium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benthic foraminiferal delta C-13 suggests that there was a net shift of isotopically light metabolic CO2 from the upper ocean into the deep ocean during the last glacial period. According to the 'CaCO3 compensation' hypothesis, this should have caused a transient drop in deep ocean CO32- that was eventually reversed by seafloor dissolution of CaCO3. The resulting increase in whole-ocean pH may have had a significant impact on atmospheric CO2, compounding any decrease that was due to the initial vertical CO2 shift. The opposite hypothetically occurred during deglaciation, when CO2 was returned to the upper ocean (and atmosphere) and deep ocean CO32- temporarily increased, followed by excess burial of CaCO3 and a drop in whole-ocean pH. The deep sea record of CaCO3 preservation appears to reflect these processes, with the largest excursion during deglaciation (as expected), but various factors make quantification of deep sea paleo-CO32- difficult. Here we reconstruct deep equatorial Pacific CO32- over the last glacial-interglacial cycle using benthic foraminiferal Zn/Ca, which is strongly affected by saturation state during calcite precipitation. Our data are in agreement with the CaCO3 compensation theory, including glacial 3 concentrations similar to (or slightly lower than) today, and a Termination I CO32- peak of similar to 25-30 mu mol kg(-1). The deglacial CO32- rise precedes ice sheet melting, consistent with the timing of the atmospheric CO2 rise. A later portion of the peak could reflect removal Of CO2 from the atmosphere-ocean system due to boreal forest regrowth. CaCO3 compensation alone may explain more than one third of the atmospheric CO2 lowering during glacial times. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available