4.7 Article

Clavatol and patulin formation as the antagonistic principle of Aspergillus clavatonanicus, an endophytic fungus of Taxus mairei

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 833-840

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1371-z

Keywords

endophytic fungi; Aspergillus clavatonanicus; Taxus mairei; antifungal activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many endophytic fungi are known to protect plants from plant pathogens, but the antagonistic mechanism has rarely been revealed. In this study, we wished to learn whether an endophytic Aspergillus sp., isolated from Taxus mairei, would indeed produce bioactive components, and if so whether (a) they would antagonize plant pathogenic fungi; and (b) whether this Aspergillus sp. would produce the compound also under conditions of confrontation with these fungi. The endophytic fungal strain from T. mairei was identified as Aspergillus clavatonanicus by analysis of morphological characteristics and the sequence of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS rDNA) of rDNA. When grown in surface culture, the fungus produced clavatol (2',4'-dihydroxy-3',5'-dimethylacetophenone) and patulin (2-hydroxy-3,7-dioxabicyclo [4.3.0]nona-5,9-dien-8-one), as shown by shown by NMR, MS, X-ray, and EI-MS analysis. Both exhibited inhibitory activity in vitro against several plant pathogenic fungi, i.e., Botrytis cinerea, Didymella bryoniae, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Pythium ultimum. During confrontation with P. ultimum, A. clavatonanicus antagonized its growth of P. ultimum, and both clavatol as well as patulin were formed as the only bioactive components, albeit with different kinetics. We conclude that A. clavatonanicus produces clavatol and patulin, and that these two polyketides may be involved in the protection of T. mairei against attack by plant pathogens by this Aspergillus sp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available