4.8 Article

Extremely potent triterpenoid inducers of the phase 2 response: Correlations of protection against oxidant and inflammatory stress

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500815102

Keywords

inflammation; Nrf2 Keap1; oxidative stress; phase 2 enzymes; NAD(P)H-quinone acceptor oxidoreductase

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA094076, R01 CA078814, CA 94076, CA 78814] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of synthetic triterpenoid (TP) analogues of oleanolic acid are powerful inhibitors of cellular inflammatory processes such as the induction by IFN-gamma of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and of cyclooxygenase 2 in mouse macrophages. Here, we show that these analogues are also extremely potent inducers of the phase 2 response [e.g., elevation of NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase and heme oxygenase 1], which is a major protector of cells against oxidative and electrophile stress. Moreover, like previously identified phase 2 inducers, the TP analogues use the antioxidant response element-Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway. Thus, induction of the phase 2 response and suppression of the NOS induction was abrogated in nrf2(-/-) and keap1(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The high potency of TP analogues in inducing the phase 2 response and blocking inflammation depends on the presence of activated Michael reaction (enone) functions at critical positions in rings A and C. The most potent TP doubles NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase in murine hepatoma cells at 0.28 nM and has an IC50 for suppression of NOS induction in primary mouse macrophages of 0.0035 nM. The direct interaction of this TP with thiol groups of the Keap1 sensor for inducers is demonstrated spectroscopically. The antiinflammatory and phase 2 inducer potencies of 18 TP are closely linearly correlated (r(2) = 0.91) over 6 orders of magnitude of concentration. Thus, in addition to blocking inflammation and promoting differentiation, these TP exhibit another very important protective property: the induction of the phase 2 response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available